Research vessel off a snow-covered Arctic coast

Integrated Probabilistic Target Ranking

The challenge

On a frontier shelf there are few wells and every new data point is expensive. The question is where the evidence supports drilling and where it does not.

0 km

0 km

2D seismic

With 600 km² of 3D seismic and 15,800 km of gravity-magnetic surveys in one geological model.

0 km

0 km

2D seismic

With 600 km² of 3D seismic and 15,800 km of gravity-magnetic surveys in one geological model.

0 wells

0 wells

Stratigraphic drilling

First shallow campaign on the Russian Arctic shelf, 300 m of core.

0 wells

0 wells

Stratigraphic drilling

First shallow campaign on the Russian Arctic shelf, 300 m of core.

10 → 0

10 → 0

Target intervals

Target intervals increased from 10 to 18.

10 → 0

10 → 0

Target intervals

Target intervals increased from 10 to 18.

+0%

+0%

Prospect resource base

7 new prospects identified.

+0%

+0%

Prospect resource base

7 new prospects identified.

The work

North Kara Sea, 2018–2023. Regional data of 32,300 km of 2D seismic, 600 km² of 3D seismic and 15,800 km of gravity-magnetic surveys were brought into one geological model, together with satellite-imagery interpretation of island outcrops and field expedition data.


Planning and supervision of the first shallow stratigraphic drilling campaign on the Russian Arctic shelf added 10 wells and 300 m of core, followed by laboratory research on core and 835 rock samples. New geophysical information grew by 82%.


The work increased target intervals from 10 to 18, grew the prospect resource base by 57% and identified 7 new prospects.

Client

Arctic Research Centre (ExxonMobil–Rosneft Arctic JV programme)

Year

2020

Category

Exploration

Focus

Multi-Source Integration · Gravity & Magnetics · Stratigraphic Drilling

Multi-Source Integration · Gravity & Magnetics · Stratigraphic Drilling

The workflow
From scattered data to a ranked drilling decision.
01
Data and decision review
Inventory of seismic, gravity-magnetic, well, core and field data. Agree the decision and the criteria.
02
Integrated framework
One consistent geological model, tied to wells and constrained by gravity-magnetic and field data.
03
Target assessment
P90/P50/P10 volumes, contacts and key risks for each target.
04
Ranking and recommendation
One list on one basis, and the data that would change it.
Drill, de-risk or drop
Built on
SeismicGravity-magneticWellsCoreField data
The workflow
From scattered data to a ranked drilling decision.
01
Data and decision review
Inventory of seismic, gravity-magnetic, well, core and field data. Agree the decision and the criteria.
02
Integrated framework
One consistent geological model, tied to wells and constrained by gravity-magnetic and field data.
03
Target assessment
P90/P50/P10 volumes, contacts and key risks for each target.
04
Ranking and recommendation
One list on one basis, and the data that would change it.
Drill, de-risk or drop
Built on
SeismicGravity-magneticWellsCoreField data

Proposal · PDF · 2 pages

Interested in a similar study?

Your challenge, the stages, what you receive and how to start, on two pages.

Cover of the two-page proposal